Christopher explains the accidental killings discussed in Makkoth and puts it into perspective with one of Kefa's letters and Yeshua saying the laws of the cohenim and how they apply to all, thus we are all guilty of the accidental killing discussed in the Talmud Portion.
In Scripture it clearly says there must be two witnesses for something to be true. Mattisyahu is the only gospel that mentions the casting of lots, during Yeshua's sacrifice. The Tanak does not discuss the casting of lots during the Sacrifice, So is Yoma 40a-40b, the second witness of the blood of Yeshua and the casting of lots for his garment? Without this source, would the account be valid based upon the two or more witness command? Given the New Testament Portion of Hebrews 9, and the Torah Portion of Leviticus 16-17, is it possible Paul was teaching Talmud given that the two things being married together in this week's Torah and New Testament Portion is tied together by the Talmud in Yoma 40a-40b.

| talmud_portion_yoma_40a-40b.mp3 |
| File Size: | 7531 kb |
| File Type: | mp3 |
Download File
Just in 2 pages in the Bavli Talmud there are 3 references to Yeshua the Messiah including "The thief in the night" giving up his life, hints to the timing of the Resurrection and the references of the cockcrow. You do not think Rabbinics can see Yeshua as Messiah in their texts? Well Passover is all about Yeshua, if they study Passover they will find him

| talmud_portion_pesachim_2a_and_2b_.mp3 |
| File Size: | 19116 kb |
| File Type: | mp3 |
Download File
Was Yeshua against the oral interpretation and the Talmud? If so then we need to rip Matthew 6:9-13 right out of our Scriptures, cause the same prayer is in the Talmud.